Responses to the LiveableYXE Survey Click on any question to see the responses from the candidates.
Peggy Schmeiser
Active and accessible cities require a variety of measures including densification and effective public transportation.
In my view, current affordable housing goals may be undermined through incentives and “right-to-build” provisions for developers by enabling and encouraging them to purchase and demolish existing potential starter homes in established neighbourhoods, send them to the landfill, and build new single or multi-unit infill dwellings that sell at premium prices and profits. Densification should build on better use or repurposing of empty and under-utilized city properties, more affordable home-building methods, and a focus on non-market and non-profit housing, that could include publicly assisted housing projects operated through cooperatives, housing associations and government services.
Residents have indicated concerns around safety with our public transit. Our bus service needs to be safe, frequent and comfortable. Bus transportation around major events should be expanded and free riding should be extended to high school students. Express routes should be established for communities like Brighton to encourage ridership.
Sidewalks must be accessible for families with children and those facing mobility challenges including seniors. It is unacceptable that major intersections like McKercher and 8th still have down ramps leading individuals out across high traffic areas with no ramps on the other side to exit roadways. Speed limits should be controlled in high pedestrian areas and reinstated around high schools.
Safety along walking and bike routes, including the riverbank, should be prioritized. Along with bike lanes, we need better winter road safety planning to accommodate vehicles, bikes, plows and pedestrians. Green spaces and outdoor activity areas are also essential for leisure and habitat preservation, along with maintaining the right mix of pet-free parks and off-leash areas.
Malvina Rapko
I would look for examples of policies that encourage mixed-use development that yield a higher impact of return. This means creating more vibrant neighborhoods with a “village” atmosphere, where housing, retail, services, and green spaces coexist, reducing the need for long commutes. One of the benefits of living in Saskatoon is that it has a small town feel which includes the advantage of a short commute. Incentives can include grants for developers who prioritize walkability, bikeability, high-density and transit-friendly projects that create a more enjoyable and accessible neighbourhood for all residents.
A part of promoting the bus rapid transit (BRT) system and bussing in general requires more advocacy on the benefits of bussing and why it’s an essential city service. As a city we need to support the various needs of transit and that includes finding ways for services to be more frequent. Bussing needs to be viewed as a viable, safer, comfortable and more convenient alternative to other modes of transportation. Perhaps more can be done to expand fare subsidies or create new fare programs that ensure transit is accessible for everyone. Many great initiatives already exist and we can do more to further encourage ridership. Including public transit in the initial neighbourhood development conversations would also improve transit, making our communities more accessible and connected.
Safety is fundamental. Cyclists need to be safe riding alongside vehicles and vehicles need to feel confident driving alongside cyclists. Future measures need to make safety, usability, accessibility and infrastructure a propriety. This can include adding more crosswalks, improving lighting, and increasing traffic-calming measures to create safer streets. Consultation needs to occur between special interest groups advocating for transit, cycling, vehicles and other modes of transportation. All types of transportation need to co-exist in a functional, pragmatic and safe way.
Kevin Zarycki
I would look at trying to improve the transit system by reaching more areas, more feeder buses with more hubs.
Darren Abrey
Densification is one component in a big toolbox for the development of a livable city. It is important to keep sight of the fact it is one component and should not be the primary factor in all considerations for development.
For Saskatoon to be a “livable city” people need to be able to afford to live here. The 2023 Annual Statement showed only 630 single family housing starts, with almost 14,000 addition people. Sustainability starts with people having safety, security, and dignity with housing. And we need much more.
Public transit is a vital service. The previous city council spent $400k on consultants to come up with rebranding for the BRT. Unfortunately for many, the BRT stands for Broken, Rotten and Terrible. We need to protect our Pandemic heroes, the fine Operators, with more than a plexiglass shield. With almost daily reports of stabbings, assaults, bear spray and drug use restoring public confidence with safety and security for the Operators and the public would be my number one priority.
In all things regarding this wide-ranging question whatever we do must be done in a way that is respectful to the ratepayers. The 2023 final budget report came in $101 million over the submitted budget for expenses.
Ron Mantyka
To promote densification, public transit, and active transport in Saskatoon, I will build on current initiatives focusing on incremental, affordable implementation without sacrificing progress.
Zoning for Densification: Leverage my municipal planning experience to promote phased zoning changes for mixed-use and mid-rise developments along transit corridors, supporting affordable, inclusive growth while preserving neighborhood character.
Public Transit Modernization: Gradually implement Saskatoon's Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) with increased frequency and dedicated lanes to enhance reliability and reduce car dependence.
Active Transport Infrastructure: Incrementally expand bike lanes and pedestrian pathways, prioritizing safety and connectivity to promote walking and biking.
Affordability and Accessibility: Ensure new developments include affordable housing and make transit and active transport accessible to all, including seniors and individuals with disabilities.
Transparency: Maintain open communication and regular updates. Building on my experience with the municipal planning commission, I will advocate for phased zoning changes that promote mixed-use and mid-rise developments along transit corridors, balancing the need for progress with community feedback to ensure affordable, inclusive growth while preserving the unique character of neighborhoods.
Accountability: Set clear goals for transit, active transport, and densification, tracking progress and public reporting to ensure accountability.
Practicality: Focus on targeted, cost-effective improvements that provide immediate benefits while ensuring financial sustainability.
Safety: Enhance safety incrementally with well-lit, secure, and protected infrastructure for transit users, cyclists, and pedestrians.
This approach ensures Saskatoon grows responsibly and affordably while becoming more connected, accessible, and sustainable for all.
Prathamesh Kale
As Saskatoon's population continues to grow, it’s crucial that we enhance our transportation infrastructure. I am seeking input from local residents on high-traffic routes commonly used by students and the working class, with the aim of increasing bus frequencies on these essential routes. We also need to identify underserved areas and consider introducing new transit options there.
Regarding densification projects, I support the downtown arena initiative, provided it does not lead to increased taxes for the public. This arena will not only attract visitors but also create jobs and establish a premier event center, drawing international events to our city and boosting our local economy.
Peggy Schmeiser
Saskatoon urgently needs to ensure affordable and sustainable housing. This is a priority for our city and densification of our urban centres will be a fundamental component of those efforts. Nevertheless, many municipalities have rejected or sought legal action to confront mass re-zoning and “right-to-build” provisions for developers due to their potential negative impacts on communities, infrastructure and affordability. Risks include both enabling and encouraging builders to focus on larger profit-making opportunities for expensive infill projects in wealthier neighbourhoods (rather than affordable housing projects), while also likely increasing overall housing costs as individual purchasers find themselves struggling to compete with wealthier developers for purchase of available houses and lots. Alternative or additional potential strategies should be explored including better use or repurposing of empty and under-utilized city properties, more affordable home-building methods, and focus on non-market, non-profit housing, that could include publicly assisted housing projects operated through cooperatives, housing associations and government services, with targeted support for more vulnerable populations.
Going forward, it will be important to focus on climate resilient strategies in our building development including commitments to LEED construction and preservation of green spaces and trees that provide natural protections against heatwaves, extreme precipitation and wind. The city’s new stormwater ponds will contribute to making Saskatoon a climate resilient city. Other emerging best practices in areas relating to flooding, energy grids, natural systems and rivers, etc. should be explored and implemented where appropriate.
Malvina Rapko
Making homes more environmentally sustainable and economically feasible appeals to many, as it combines helping the environment with lower utility costs. While governments already offer incentives for sustainable choices in home building and renovations, it would be beneficial to expand these efforts to educate the public on their advantages. The city could organize educational fairs or ongoing campaigns to reach a broader audience, highlighting the benefits of energy-efficient solutions. These platforms could also provide detailed information on retrofitting older homes or building new ones with sustainable practices, helping people understand the full impact of these initiatives.
To make housing more sustainable, I would advocate for accessible retrofit programs offering grants and low-interest loans to improve energy efficiency, potentially leveraging federal funding like the Housing Accelerator Fund to reduce costs. Green spaces are essential for cooling urban areas and enhancing quality of life, so I support policies requiring new developments to integrate features that naturally reduce heat and support biodiversity. As a winter city, Saskatoon also needs snow management features, such as sloped roofs for snow shedding and designated snow storage in neighborhoods. Solutions for large snow dumps should be cost-effective and environmentally responsible, and investing in innovative snow removal vehicles could further support efficient snow management.
Expanding Saskatoon’s green infrastructure is key to a more livable and climate-resilient city. Our beautiful Meewasin Trail not only promotes outdoor activity but also draws visitors, benefiting the economy. By collaborating with developers, non-profits, and community partners, we can make sustainable, renewable homes accessible for all income levels. This approach to affordability and sustainability will support Saskatoon’s growth in a way that is both economically and environmentally viable.
Kevin Zarycki
This area of concern, makes it hard to have both environmentally and inexpensive problems solved. I think it should be up to the builders to promote and provide environmental choices.
Darren Abrey
We are in a national housing crisis. Saskatoon is not immune. The Saskatoon Advantage for affordability has been taken away by not only the soaring prices and rents but also the largess of a City Council that has raised taxes almost 30% in a 5 year span, with corresponding increases in utilities and waste management. Concerns over “rising temperatures and extremes” are a luxury of the wealthy as people struggle with soaring rents, grocery and fuel prices and increasing homelessness.
With the end of the NDP Supply and Confidence Agreement with the Federal Liberals, a federal election is in the near future. It may even be called while we are in the current Civic election cycle. As our housing plans are largely dependent on grants from the Federal Government, we need to make sure the great people in the city administration are nimble and prepared to align with the stated goals (and funding) from future Federal governments. A key component in the housing strategy for the potential next Federal government is removing the gatekeepers. We need to ensure stable funding, and that would be by assuring we are not impeding growth.
We have stringent environmental standards in place and coming in with the level 3 National Building Code standards for efficiency which will take effect Jan 1, 2025. These standards have also been adopted by the Provincial Government. There is no need to layer on additional red tape, expense, and delay for home construction at a time when it is desperately needed. I would propose the City simplify the process and revert to the NBC.
Ron Mantyka
To ensure Saskatoon has access to housing that is both environmentally friendly and economically sustainable—regardless of varying perspectives on climate change, I propose the following practical strategy:
1. Sustainable Housing Construction: Support the adoption of energy-efficient building standards like Passive House or LEED certifications. These standards create homes that are resilient to extreme weather conditions and reduce long-term operating costs, benefiting homeowners and the community alike.
2. Energy Efficiency Upgrades: Encourage retrofitting existing homes with technologies such as heat pumps, enhanced insulation, and solar panels. These upgrades lower energy consumption, reduce costs, and improve the homes' ability to manage temperature variations.
3. Transit-Oriented Development: As discussed above, prioritize developing housing near public transit hubs to cut transportation costs, decrease emissions, and promote sustainable urban growth. This approach enhances accessibility while fostering efficient land use.
4. Green Infrastructure: Integrate green spaces, urban forests, and sustainable landscaping into housing developments. These features help mitigate heat, enhance neighborhood aesthetics, and improve overall livability.
5. Public Engagement: Involve the community in housing policy development to reflect residents' needs and values. Engaging the public builds broader support and ensures projects align with community priorities.
6. Practical Implementation: Begin with pilot projects and expand gradually. This phased approach allows for cost-effective progress, minimizes risk, and delivers sustainable housing solutions that are adaptable and financially prudent.
Prathamesh Kale
To ensure that Saskatoon has access to housing that is both environmentally and economically sustainable in the face of rising temperatures and climatic extremes, I propose the following:
Sustainable Construction Practices: Encourage the use of eco-friendly materials and construction methods that minimize environmental impact. This includes promoting energy-efficient designs that reduce waste and energy consumption.
Energy Efficiency Initiatives: Implement strict energy efficiency standards for new homes, incorporating solar energy utilization and high-performance insulation. This not only lowers energy costs for residents but also reduces the overall carbon footprint.
Utilization of the Housing Accelerator Fund: Leverage this fund to invest in affordable housing projects that prioritize sustainability, ensuring that they meet both economic and environmental standards.
Proximity to Public Transit: Develop housing projects near public transit hubs to promote sustainable commuting options, reducing reliance on personal vehicles and lowering greenhouse gas emissions.
Integration of Green Spaces: Design neighborhoods that include ample green spaces, which can help mitigate heat, improve air quality, and enhance community well-being.
Community Engagement: Involve local residents in the planning process to ensure that housing solutions meet their needs and incorporate sustainable practices that reflect the community’s values.
By taking these comprehensive steps, we can create a resilient housing strategy that supports both the environment and the economy in Saskatoon.
Peggy Schmeiser
While I believe our Low Emissions Community Plan is an important tool in our response to climate change, many have pointed out various limitations including its daunting $16B cost, unclear approach to targets, resource constraints, and limited public participation. Regrettably, there has been very little reporting on progress to date, while emission levels are also unclear at this stage. More incentives for energy efficiencies would typically be effective and welcome but placing any additional costs on property owners or businesses may be challenging for many.
Looking ahead, we must ensure we are developing clear strategies based on public input, adequate resourcing and identifiable targets. Collaboration and buy-in across public, private, post-secondary and community sector partners will be critical to our success in identifying and meeting our low emission objectives in the future.
Malvina Rapko
I am committed to supporting the success of the Low Emissions Community Plan. While I am still in the process of learning the intricacies of the plan, I recognize its importance in addressing climate change and making Saskatoon more sustainable for future generations.
From what I've observed, one of the reasons the plan may have missed its emissions targets could be related to challenges in implementation—whether it’s a lack of funding, insufficient public engagement, lack of accountability, or logistical hurdles in scaling up key initiatives. As a candidate, I’m eager to dig deeper into these issues and understand where the gaps lie.
To get the plan back on track, I would focus on building strong partnerships with community members, businesses, and experts in environmental policy. Listening to all collaborators will be key in identifying what needs to change. Additionally, I would advocate for setting clear, achievable short-term goals to create momentum, along with pushing for accountability mechanisms so we can measure progress more transparently. By staying engaged, learning from other cities’ successes, and working collaboratively, I believe we can make real strides in reducing our emissions.
Kevin Zarycki
I just don’t believe it is achievable.
Darren Abrey
The city has been thin on reporting on the Low Emissions Plan, so it’s hard to gauge why it is a failure. Resources are becoming increasingly scarce; emission goals need to have meaningful reductions without increasing the burden on the people. Future work must fit within the framework of fiscal responsibility and return for investment. The low carbon future of Saskatchewan, and Saskatoon as a major utility player, will need to get on board with support for the SMR ambitions we see taking flight nationally and globally. We are the host city for the headquarters of the world’s most eminent Nuclear Power corporation, it’s time to put our civic support into expanding this industry starting right here at home. Electric buses are fantastic when they work, but ultimately, they are Gas and Coal powered, with the emissions being shunted somewhere else.
Ron Mantyka
The Low Emissions Community (LEC) Plan reflects a responsible approach to sustainability, but opinions differ on its significance. My goal is to ensure the plan remains both practical and effective, focusing on realistic actions that we can implement with current resources while balancing economic and environmental priorities.
Reasons for Missing Emissions Targets:
1. Implementation Delays: The transition from planning to execution has been slower than expected.
2. Resource Constraints: Limited funding and staffing have hindered project progress.
3. Overreliance on Benchmarking: Adapting strategies from other cities hasn't always aligned with Saskatoon's unique context.
4. Insufficient Public Engagement: Some initiatives lacked broad community support, affecting their success.
Actions to Get the Plan Back on Track:
1. Immediate, Cost-Effective Actions:
a. Energy Efficiency Upgrades: Incentivize homeowners and businesses to adopt quick, cost-effective energy-saving measures.
b. Simplify Renewable Energy Adoption: Make it easier and more affordable for residents to install renewable energy systems like solar panels
2. Enhance Community Engagement:
a. Direct Communication: Educate residents on straightforward actions they can take now without overwhelming them.
b. Feedback Channels: Set up accessible platforms for public input to ensure initiatives reflect local priorities.
3. Optimize Resources:
a. Reallocate Existing Funds: Focus on projects that deliver the most immediate impact within our current budget.
b. Seek External Funding: Pursue grants and partnerships to supplement city resources.
4. Tailored Solutions:
a. Local Focus: Develop strategies that fit Saskatoon’s specific needs rather than copying other cities.
b. Support Local Innovation: Encourage cost-effective, local solutions to address unique challenges.
c. Streamline Implementation:
5. Cut Red Tape:
a. Simplify approval processes to reduce delays.
b. Focused Teams: Create small, de
Prathamesh Kale
I am fully committed to the success of the Low Emissions Community Plan, recognizing its importance for sustainable development in Saskatoon. The plan has likely missed its emissions targets due to insufficient public engagement, resource allocation, and a lack of clear accountability measures.
To get it back on track, I would prioritize community involvement to raise awareness and support, ensure that adequate funding is allocated for implementation, and establish measurable goals with regular progress assessments. By fostering collaboration between stakeholders and enhancing transparency, we can effectively drive the plan forward and achieve our emissions reduction objectives.
Peggy Schmeiser
While I understand the merits of having transportation infrastructure to bypass the city, I am opposed to the Saskatoon freeway as currently proposed, particularly Phase II that includes crossing the Northeast Swale and Small Swale. These environmentally sensitive and increasingly rare areas and habitats must be protected.
If possible, I believe Phase 2 should include the possibility of a wider sweep to bypass the affected areas. While that may be difficult due to proximity to other routes, some have also suggested that Phase 2 be entirely removed from the project and I believe that option should be explored further if needed to protect important habitats. I understand that the province has expressed challenges associated with both of those two approaches. Nevertheless, efforts and negotiations must continue with a view to ensuring protection of those environmental areas. As part of these efforts, the City should continue to work with organizations like the Meewasin Valley Authority, the Saskatoon Nature Society and others to help increase public understanding and engagement around these important issues.
Malvina Rapko
I value Saskatoon’s natural biodiversity, and the Northeast and Small Swales are irreplaceable ecosystems that contribute to the ecological health and beauty of our city. These areas are home to unique wildlife and play a vital role in preserving Saskatoon's natural heritage. Given the significant impact the proposed Saskatoon Freeway would have on these sensitive areas, I have concerns about the project as it stands. Placing a multilane freeway through one of Saskatoon's most biodiverse regions could result in lasting environmental damage, disrupting habitats, and threatening species that rely on these ecosystems.
While I understand the need for infrastructure development, I believe we must explore alternatives that prioritize the protection of our natural environment. I would advocate for solutions that minimize harm to these vital areas, such as exploring different routes, enhancing public transit, or reconsidering the scope of the project. We have a responsibility to ensure that Saskatoon’s growth doesn’t come at the expense of our natural landscapes and future generations.
Kevin Zarycki
I am not in favour of having a multi lane freeway though the swale. We already have a road in that area.
Darren Abrey
I support the project. It can be completed in an environmentally conscious manner.
Saskatoon is an important key city for many resources and industries, and also sits on the transportation routes that get our fantastic products out to feed and power the world.
We need to get the commercial traffic and the pollution, wear and tear, and congestion of a growing city out of the neighborhoods. Bus lanes are bike paths are much easier to accept when they and the other commuters aren’t competing with tandem gravel, grain and oil transporters.
Ron Mantyka
I do not support the Saskatoon Freeway as currently proposed due to its potential impact on the Northeast and Small Swales, areas of exceptional biodiversity and natural abundance. Rather than developing new infrastructure that risks damaging these critical ecosystems, we should focus on the better design and redevelopment of existing corridors. This includes implementing overpasses and relocating train tracks to optimize current routes and minimize disruption to natural areas.
Additionally, the future of transportation is evolving, with advancements in AI and self-driving vehicles. These innovations could lead to more efficient use of existing infrastructure, reducing the need for new large-scale developments like the Saskatoon Freeway. Planning should be forward-thinking, considering both environmental preservation and the technological advancements shaping tomorrow's transportation landscape.
Prathamesh Kale
While I recognize the potential benefits of the proposed Saskatoon Freeway in improving transportation efficiency and connectivity, I have significant concerns regarding its impact on the Northeast and Small Swales' biodiversity. It’s crucial to balance infrastructure development with the preservation of our natural areas.
I believe it’s important to engage in further consultation with environmental experts and the community to explore alternatives or modifications that can mitigate ecological impacts while still addressing transportation needs. Ensuring that our development projects are sustainable and considerate of our environment is essential for the long-term health of our city and its ecosystems.
Peggy Schmeiser
With diverse Indigenous and newcomer heritage, Saskatoon provides a vibrant and prosperous home for many. However, the 2023 civic services survey found that almost 30% of residents don’t feel that Saskatoon is an inclusive and welcoming city to all. Our city is built on experience and cultures from all over our world and more needs to be done to showcase that richness and the strength we derive from it.
Regretfully, people throughout our city and neighbourhoods find themselves impacted daily by racism, the legacy of residential schools, gender and sexual discrimination, poverty, language barriers, physical and mental health issues, etc. We must address these challenges through greater understanding and celebration of our diversity, particularly through programs and festivals undertaken in collaboration with schools and youth.
A healthy city requires support for active transportation options around biking and walking and for those with mobility issues. We must ensure safe and greater numbers of spaces for leisure and sports, which themselves provide pathways to inclusion. Increased outdoor venues and forums for festivals and concerts that celebrate local cultures, art, drama and music would instill an even brighter sense of community and pride in our urban spaces.
Saskatoon must also continue its initiatives to support Reconciliation including focus on the TRC Calls to Action, addressing violence against Indigenous women, girls and two-spirit people, and Indigenous guidance on city activities.
Dignity and respect are not just a two-way street but an entire road system that connects all of us to one another. In collaboration with community partners, the City must work to ensure that everyone feels healthy, safe and at home in our communities.
Malvina Rapko
Drawing from my background as a child newcomer and living the newcomer experience through my parents, grandparents and my own integration led towards a professional path of becoming an Intercultural Consultant, a Relocation and Settlement Specialist and an Emotional Literacy Facilitator. I feel that Saskatoon has done many things that contribute towards cultural and emotional wellbeing and that helps foster a sense of belonging. I also believe that we can do even more. I think the City could act as a central hub that helps people get the services they need in a faster and more efficient way that could contribute to improvements in existing services such as employment, housing, recreation, transportation and education. It would be essential to continue building strong collaborative partnerships with existing cultural, Indigenous, and community organizations ensuring that policies and initiatives reflect the real needs and aspirations of Saskatoon’s diverse residents. These groups provide valuable insights into creating inclusive, supportive and integrated programming.
I believe that in order to make Saskatoon a leading choice and an inviting place to live and work we need to address underlying factors that contribute to some of the gaps and overwhelm in services that people are experiencing. There is a major disconnect between Federal decisions and provincial programs that impact city services. We are not able to be a truly welcoming city if the services needed for a city to thrive are being depleted. We need to ensure that municipal services, healthcare, education, and social programs are accessible and responsive to the diverse cultural backgrounds that exist today and to the growing needs in Saskatoon are sufficiently addressed and supported.
Kevin Zarycki
I think Saskatoon has a lot of places for everyone to enjoy.
Darren Abrey
Saskatoon is an amazing cultural mosaic. We need to ensure that cultural differences are celebrated, and a large portion of that is by fostering understanding. We need to do more to incubate cultural acceptance. It won’t happen through government edict.
As a city, in culture and in all aspects of urban life the city should strive to make it simple and easy for community groups to hold celebrations and events. Empower the communities and leverage the assets of the city to share the culture with their neighbours.
Ron Mantyka
Investing at the community level is essential to making Saskatoon a truly diverse, inclusive, and welcoming place to live and work. Rather than focusing solely on large-scale development projects, community investments have a more direct and meaningful impact on residents' daily lives.
Community-Focused Investments: Enhancing local parks, playgrounds, and civic centers builds a strong sense of belonging and inclusivity. These spaces are where neighbors interact, families gather, and cultures are shared. Investing in these community hubs not only improves the physical environment but also creates vibrant spaces that encourage engagement.
Accessible and Welcoming Spaces: Well-maintained parks and playgrounds promote outdoor activity, family interaction, and a connection with nature, supporting both physical and mental well-being. Upgrading civic center’s ensures all residents have access to resources, events, and programs that foster inclusivity, from cultural celebrations to educational workshops.
Balanced Growth: While large-scale developments contribute to economic growth, a balanced approach ensures smaller community projects aren't overlooked. These investments promote equity by addressing the needs of residents, particularly in neighborhoods that may not typically benefit from larger developments. This strategy aligns with sustainability goals, enhancing the quality of life across the entire city rather than concentrating benefits in certain areas.
By prioritizing investments in community infrastructure—such as parks, playgrounds, and civic centers—alongside larger projects, Saskatoon can become a more inclusive and resilient city. This balance builds trust and engagement at the grassroots level while driving growth that benefits all citizens
Prathamesh Kale
To make Saskatoon a leading choice as a diverse, inclusive, and inviting place to live and work, several key features are essential:
Cultural Diversity: Promote and celebrate the city’s diverse cultures through festivals, events, and public art that reflect the community’s multicultural heritage.
Community Engagement: Foster opportunities for residents to participate in decision-making processes, ensuring that all voices are heard and valued.
Accessible Public Spaces: Design parks, recreational areas, and gathering spots that are accessible to everyone, regardless of age or ability, encouraging community interaction.
Affordable Housing: Ensure a range of housing options that cater to various income levels, promoting social integration and stability.
Support for Local Businesses: Encourage diverse businesses through grants and programs, creating a vibrant local economy that reflects the community’s diversity.
Safe Environments: Ensure public safety through well-lit spaces and community policing initiatives, making all residents feel secure in their neighborhoods.
By focusing on these features, Saskatoon can enhance its appeal as a welcoming city for all.
Peggy Schmeiser
While it is important to have long-term vision that can support growth and sustainability, residents are concerned with proposed spending and large-scale initiatives. They are looking for City Council to exercise "common-sense" in balancing needs versus wants.
Although I support the intention to revitalize Saskatoon’s downtown and to have sufficiently large and upgraded venues and facilities to attract large-scale entertainment and conference events, I also believe that concerns around projected costs and potential escalations beyond the $1.2B mark for the DEED are understandable. With no commitments from other levels of government and the prospect of significant costs being borne by taxpayers, businesses and/or hotels, it would be premature to support the DEED proposal. We must proceed to get a better sense of potential impacts and opportunities. In the meantime, we should support reasonable renovations and upgrades to TCU Place and SaskTel Centre and work to improve downtown so it again becomes a place people wish to visit.
Saskatoon has a triple A credit rating and prudence in our finances and budgeting must be maintained. Financial decision-making and processes, including around the DEED, must be governed by principles of transparency, coherence and ethics. Strong relations with provincial, federal and private partners can help address increasing pressures on municipalities and enable solutions for the complex, costly challenges we’re facing.
It is important that the city focus on its core mandates and be accountable in its finances and decision-making. This includes ensuring that residents and homeowners are well informed about major decisions and spending impacting them and that they have the opportunity to engage and be heard by City officials.
Malvina Rapko
When it comes to the Downtown Event & Entertainment District (DEED) project, I believe it’s essential to approach it with both a fiscal responsibility and long-term vision in mind. While modernizing Saskatoon as a go-to destination for events and entertainment is a priority, we need to ensure that any investments made deliver real value for residents and businesses and doesn't put an undue strain on our residential tax. I would focus on a cost-benefit analysis to ensure that the DEED project maximize returns without burdening taxpayers unnecessarily. This means exploring public-private partnerships and grant opportunities to offset costs, as well as phasing development to align with the city's financial capacity. The goal is to create a vibrant district that attracts visitors, boosts the local economy, and enhances the quality of life for all Saskatoon residents, without compromising fiscal responsibility.
More generally, my approach to municipal spending would prioritize projects that make Saskatoon more attractive and livable while delivering tangible benefits. That includes investing in infrastructure that supports growth and sustainability, like public transit and green spaces, alongside cultural and recreational opportunities that make Saskatoon an exciting place to live, work, and visit. By carefully managing our resources and focusing on projects with long-term community impact, we can build a thriving city that’s both financially sound and full of things to do.
Kevin Zarycki
I don’t think it is up to the taxpayers of Saskatoon to subsidize a private business. I don’t think this project is needed at this time with so many people in need.
Darren Abrey
Saskatoon is the 17th most populous city in the country surpassing 300k in 2024, 350k in the metro area. An entertainment venue such as being proposed is something one fully expects to be a part of a modern, livable city. We had similar discussions way back when I was a lad, with much weeping and gnashing of teeth over the Sask Place- SaskTel Centre. It was eventually built at a staggering cost of $26 million dollars. ($58 million in 2024 dollars)
The gate for the 6 Garth Brooks shows in 2016 was higher than the total cost of construction.
So the new place is going to be expensive. We find now the price tag is an eye watering 1.2 Billion. What I know for sure is that price tag is multiples of what it would have cost 8 years ago, and is very likely a fraction of what it will cost 8 years from now.
I am committing publicly in my campaign to be responsible to the taxpayers of Saskatoon. Never again should we have the massive increases and costs to the citizens, fully depleting the fiscal stabilization reserve, and I will vote against budgets that exceed the mandate. Therefore, we need to approach the project with that in mind. The project also needs to bring the Indigenous people to the table beyond the lip service of land acknowledgments.
Ron Mantyka
Municipal spending and community investment should prioritize enhancing the downtown core to attract private sector development, reducing the need for direct city involvement in large projects like DEED. By creating a favorable environment, the city will encourage businesses and investors to lead revitalization efforts, fostering sustainable economic growth and community well-being.
Municipal Spending Priorities:
1. Infrastructure Improvements: Upgrade roads, public transit, and pedestrian pathways for better accessibility. Enhance public spaces such as parks and streetscapes to make downtown more inviting.
2. Regulatory Facilitation:
Simplify permitting and zoning processes to reduce barriers for developers.
Implement flexible zoning policies to encourage mixed-use developments.
3. Economic Incentives:
Require developers to post performance bonds to ensure project completion and protect the city from unfinished work.
Offer tax incentives tied to project performance and completion.
Provide grants to offset costs incurred during development, aligning projects with community goals like sustainability.
4. Safety and Cleanliness:
Increase public safety measures to ensure a secure environment.
Allocate resources for regular cleaning and maintenance of public areas.
5. Community Engagement:
Encourage public input through town halls and surveys to align development with community needs.
6. Promotion of Arts and Culture:
Support cultural events and festivals to draw visitors downtown.
Invest in preserving historical sites to maintain the city's unique character.
7. Environmental Sustainability:
Develop green spaces and promote eco-friendly building practices.
Invest in sustainable infrastructure, such as energy-efficient lighting.
Implement smart city technologies to improve service delivery and efficiency.
Prathamesh Kale
I support the downtown arena project, as it will serve as a vital attraction for our city, which is losing its charm. An arena will draw tourism, create jobs, and boost our local economy and transportation system. However, I oppose any tax increases on the general public, who are already under significant financial strain. We should explore private partnerships and seek federal and provincial grants to fund this initiative. I genuinely believe this project will enhance our city's appeal and position it as a major entertainment destination in Saskatchewan.
Peggy Schmeiser
Homelessness and potential related issues around mental health and addiction present urgent and complex challenges for all cities in Canada, including Saskatoon. Addressing homelessness and housing is within the purview of our provincial government but City Hall has a strong role to play in negotiating for secure, adequate resources to address these issues and in working with those responsible for programs and service delivery to ensure the best solutions for our municipality. Toronto’s homeless shelters now reportedly house almost triple the number of children they did eight years ago. This is terrifying and unconscionable and all levels of government must urgently work together with communities and those experiencing homelessness to find solutions.
Beyond shelters, we need coordinated, wrap-around support to address the route causes of homelessness and houselessness across the diverse groups now experiencing this crisis. Effective strategies include “pathways” approaches as part of the Housing First model offering access to a network of supports, focused case management and more expedient access to housing. Dismantling encampments with no long-term plans for assistance exacerbate tensions and crises. Enhanced collaboration, as recently implemented between the Prince Albert Police and Metis Women’s Outreach Team in addressing encampments and helping individuals to find necessary resources, should be pursued and supported. Initiatives like Winnipeg’s Tiny Homes Village for those escaping homelessness could perhaps also serve as helpful models for providing homes for people transitioning to their own place in the community.
Local organizations, alongside those experiencing homelessness and houselessness, should lead discussions about what can best identify and address problems within our municipal context. Increased awareness and public support around homelessness is also essential to ensure we approach these challenges with a spirit of care and support.
Malvina Rapko
Addressing homelessness requires a multifaceted approach that addresses contributing factors like inadequate mental health support, addiction, domestic violence, rising costs of housing and essentials, systemic barriers, provincial policy impacts, federal funding gaps, and other factors. We need a clear understanding of current efforts, identifying overlaps, inefficiencies, and key collaborators to create sustainable, supportive solutions.
Municipalities across Canada are implementing innovative strategies to address homelessness by meeting immediate needs and tackling root causes through housing, support services, and partnerships. Saskatoon could benefit by blending these approaches with our own solutions. For example, Medicine Hat’s “Housing First” model provides stable housing without preconditions, followed by services like mental health care, addiction treatment, and job training, addressing homelessness by focusing on housing as the first priority. Edmonton’s Tiny Home Village offers affordable, low-maintenance housing alongside essential services, fostering community and support to help individuals transition to stable lives. Addressing homelessness requires varied solutions, and wraparound services such as counseling, life skills training, and employment support which are essential to helping individuals maintain housing and improve quality of life.
We have existing support services doing a lot of important and essential work. We need a coordinated effort to organize all services, get more funding from every level of government. look for other forms of funding and get the information to those that need it most. We must properly support existing services and create new initiatives that address individual needs all while providing a safe warm place to live that instills hope for the future.
Kevin Zarycki
I don’t claim to have all the solutions for homelessness, but I believe we need to make our city affordable. Adopting more policies to help small businesses thrive so they can grow and hire more people. Ensure local agencies are properly funded to help those in need.
Darren Abrey
Its heartbreaking. The Homeless aren’t merely a demographic. Each one is a person. Someone’s son, daughter, father, mother, sister, brother, friend. Addictions are taking a terrible toll here, and across the country.
I have spent some time with people fighting addictions, and I can tell you sober, with proper help, these people are amazing. They aren’t just a demographic. Health, mental health and addictions are a responsibility of the Provincial government. Drug policy and enforcement are largely in the Lap of the federal government. The cities are left on the front lines taking the brunt of poor decisions by those in Regina and Parliament Hill.
It used to be the community that took care of the downtrodden. It is a sign of the times where everyone looks to government, at all levels, to solve the problems the community used to solve. A city government must do all it can to promote community organizations, remove barriers, to allow them to engage in solutions. I commend the fine people at the Mustard Seed. The parishioners of St Mary’s and other inner city religious groups who have been stepping forward to fill the gap.
We need to restore hope. We need to push our Federal and Provincial governments to step up and fulfill their part of the bargain. We need safe and secure streets. We need housing to be accessible and affordable for everyone regardless of status. We need community organizations to again take the lead. What we shouldn’t do is accept warehousing people as some sort of end goal or accomplishment. We need to get our brothers and sisters, sons and daughter back.
Ron Mantyka
Addressing Homelessness: A Collaborative and Sustainable Approach
Homelessness is a complex and growing issue, and Saskatoon is not immune to its challenges. I believe that addressing it requires more than short-term fixes—it demands a comprehensive and transformative approach. Drawing on my experience in business development and project management, I understand the importance of bringing together diverse voices and coordinating efforts to achieve sustainable, practical solutions.
I propose the creation of two specialized authorities to tackle homelessness in Saskatoon
1. Chronic Homelessness Authority:
This body would focus on long-term homelessness, particularly for those affected by addiction, mental health issues, and persistent housing instability.
By integrating services such as policing, mental health professionals, addiction support, and social services, we can ensure a coordinated, holistic response to help individuals move beyond homelessness.
2. Episodic Homelessness Authority:
This authority would address temporary homelessness, helping individuals and families regain stability through employment assistance, transitional housing, and short-term support.
The goal would be to quickly reintegrate people into stable living conditions, minimizing their time spent in homelessness.
Both authorities would involve representatives from federal, provincial, city, and First Nations governments, along with experts in housing and social policy and operate as an Authority not subject to interference from any of the participating partners. Together, we would work to address the root causes of homelessness, such as poverty, mental health, and employment barriers, while developing long-term strategies to reduce homelessness in Saskatoon.
I’m committed to building a unified, collaborative effort that leverages the necessary resources and expertise to address homelessness effectively, creating lasting change and better outcomes for our community.
Prathamesh Kale
I agree addressing homelessness is a complex issue, the few ideas I would like to put forwards as a solution plan would be:
Increased Affordable Housing: Develop more affordable housing options to ensure that everyone has access to safe and stable living conditions.
Support Services: Expand access to mental health and addiction services to help individuals facing challenges that contribute to homelessness.
Emergency Shelters and Transitional Housing: Enhance emergency shelters and create transitional housing programs that offer support while individuals work towards permanent solutions.
Job Training and Employment Programs: Implement job training and employment initiatives to help individuals gain skills and secure stable jobs, reducing the risk of homelessness.
Community Engagement: Foster collaboration between local government, non-profit organizations, and community members to develop effective strategies tailored to the specific needs of the population.
Prevention Programs: Focus on prevention strategies, such as rental assistance and legal support, to help individuals at risk of homelessness maintain their housing.
Awareness Campaigns: Launch campaigns to raise awareness and reduce stigma around homelessness, promoting understanding and encouraging community support.